On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 1036: Motion to Table Boxer S.Amdt.1036; To eliminate the coverage gap for individuals with cancer.Result: Agreed to (54-44, 2 members not voting, 1/2 threshold)Details: [click here]
-
This Month
Senate Roll Call Vote #00249
Jun 26, ’03
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 1097: McConnell S.Amdt.1097; To protect seniors who are diagnosed with cancer from high prescription drug costsResult: Agreed to (97-1, 2 members not voting, 1/2 threshold)Details: [click here]
Senate Roll Call Vote #00251
Jun 26, ’03
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 1065: Bingaman S.Amdt.1065; To update, beginning in 2009, the asset or resource test used for purposes of determining the eligibility of low-income beneficiaries for premium and cost-sharing subsidies.Result: Agreed to (69-29, 2 members not voting, 1/2 threshold)Details: [click here]
Senate Roll Call Vote #00261
Jun 26, ’03
On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 1060: Motion To Table Feinstein S.Amdt.1060; To provide for an income-related increase in the part B premium for individuals with income in excess of $75,000 and married couples with income in excess of $150,000.Result: Rejected (38-59, 3 members not voting, 1/2 threshold)Details: [click here]
Senate Roll Call Vote #00250
Jun 26, ’03
On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 1036: Motion to Table Boxer S.Amdt.1036; To eliminate the coverage gap for individuals with cancer.Result: Agreed to (54-44, 2 members not voting, 1/2 threshold)Details: [click here]
Senate Roll Call Vote #00249
Jun 26, ’03
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 1097: McConnell S.Amdt.1097; To protect seniors who are diagnosed with cancer from high prescription drug costsResult: Agreed to (97-1, 2 members not voting, 1/2 threshold)Details: [click here]
Senate Roll Call Vote #00261
Jun 26, ’03
On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 1060: Motion To Table Feinstein S.Amdt.1060; To provide for an income-related increase in the part B premium for individuals with income in excess of $75,000 and married couples with income in excess of $150,000.Result: Rejected (38-59, 3 members not voting, 1/2 threshold)Details: [click here]
Senate Roll Call Vote #00248
Jun 26, ’03
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 1052: Edwards S.Amdt.1052; To strengthen protections for consumers against misleading direct-to-consumer drug advertising.Result: Rejected (39-59, 2 members not voting, 1/2 threshold)Details: [click here]
Senate Roll Call Vote #00247
Jun 26, ’03
On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 991: Motion To Table Harkin S.Amdt.991 As Modified; To establish a demonstration project under the Medicaid program to encourage the provision of community-based services to individuals with disabilities.Result: Agreed to (50-48, 2 members not voting, 1/2 threshold)Details: [click here]
Senate Roll Call Vote #00248
Jun 26, ’03
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 1052: Edwards S.Amdt.1052; To strengthen protections for consumers against misleading direct-to-consumer drug advertising.Result: Rejected (39-59, 2 members not voting, 1/2 threshold)Details: [click here]