Appellate courts hear many cases on non-controversial issues of law; few are overturned by the Supreme Court
MYTH: Judge Gorsuch and Republican senators are pointing to the fact that 97% of Judge Gorsuch’s cases on the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals were decided unanimously, likely trying to argue that he is a mainstream nominee.
FACT: A 97% unanimity rate at the circuit court level is not unusual. Appellate courts are required to hear many cases on non-controversial issues of law, which can be, and often are, decided unanimously.
Take the 10th Circuit, which averaged 2.3% dissents from 1990-2007. Indeed, across all circuit courts from 1990-2007, the average dissent rate was 2.7%. [The Behavior of Federal Judges, Epstein Landes and Posner, 2013; p.265]
FACT: When it comes to decisions that are not unanimous – the difficult cases - the stats are much more telling. Of the 168 non-unanimous opinions which Judge Gorsuch heard, he wrote or joined the majority in only 96 of them (57%). He wrote separately 66 times (39%) and joined another judge’s concurrence or dissent 6 times (4%).
FACT: While Judge Gorsuch joined many unanimous opinions, he also took pains to write his own opinion (either in concurrence or dissent) many times. He even wrote concurrences to majority opinions he himself wrote.
Concurrences: Judge Gorsuch has authored 31 concurrences, including 2 concurrences to unanimous panel opinions that Judge Gorsuch himself wrote. In other words, 31 times he wrote separately to say he agreed with the outcome but had a different view of out to reach it.
Dissents: Judge Gorsuch wrote 26 dissents. In other words, 26 times his opinion could not garner majority support from his colleagues.
Partial Concurrence/Dissents: Judge Gorsuch has written 9 partial concurrence or dissents. In other words, he has written separately 9 times to say he couldn’t fully support the outcome of the majority.
MYTH: Judge Gorsuch and Republican Senators are pointing to the fact that he has “never been overturned by the Supreme Court,” as evidence that his jurisprudence is beyond reproach.
FACT: