Skip to content

Schumer Floor Remarks On Senate Republicans Standing In The Way of Bipartisan Emergency COVID Relief To Support The American People

Washington, D.C. — Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) today spoke on the Senate floor regarding the need to pass serious bipartisan emergency legislation to provide relief from the COVID pandemic. Senator Schumer laid out the need to support our essential workers and state and local governments and explained how the Republican Leader has blocked compromise legislation for months as the pandemic worsened. Below are Senator Schumer’s remarks, which can also be viewed here:

The CARES Act passed the Senate on March 27, 2020 –it was a rare moment of bipartisanship and legislative triumph that saved our country from disaster in the very early days of the pandemic. As you know, I sat and negotiated a great deal of that with Secretary Mnuchin and we all agree it did a lot of good.                                

But unfortunately, for the past 259 days, the virus continued to spread.

The virus has continued to spread.

Thousands of small businesses have closed their doors for good. Tens of millions of Americans lost their jobs and livelihoods.

As American families waited in 21st Century bread lines, cars snaking for miles down American highways; as tens of millions of Americans fell behind on the rent and the mortgage and faced eviction; as 15 million Americans got sick; and as 292,001 Americans died—the Senate Republican majority, led by the Majority Leader, made sure the Senate could not do anything of significance to help the American people.

May, June, July, August: “pause”; we don’t need to do anything, said the Leader. Let’s wait and see what happens. Democrats didn’t say that – the Leader did – waited and waited and waited.

Now it’s December and we still—because of the Leader’s intransigence—have nothing of significance to help the American people during the worst economic crisis in seventy-five years, and the greatest public health crisis in a century.

Why? Why can’t we get together? Why can’t there by the bipartisanship that Americans search for and yearn for at a time of such great crisis?

There’s one reason why America’s two major parties have not gotten together during a time of acute national emergency. That is because the Republican Leader has demanded a partisan poison pill—a sweeping corporate liability shield—be included in any legislation, otherwise he won’t let it pass.

It sounds like an exaggeration, but that’s what the Leader has said. “We're not negotiating over liability protection,” the Leader said, on July 28th. “I'll be responsible for putting the final agreement on the floor. And as I said, it will have liability protection in it. We're not negotiating with the Democrats over that.”

That’s the fact. That’s the history. There is not equality here.

Finally, yesterday, as the bipartisan group of Senators and House members were closing in on a final agreement, what happened? Yesterday, the Republican Leader’s team told the other congressional leaders that the bipartisan group would be unable to satisfy Senate Republicans.

Why? Because it might not grant the exact, sweeping liability protections for corporations that Leader McConnell has demanded.

It’s an unconscionable position: no relief for the American people unless corporations receive blanket immunity from lawsuits.

That particular poison pill, that has foiled bipartisan agreement for more than eight months, is the nub of the problem. If we could just get past that, if the Republican Leader would only back off the maximalist demands on corporate immunity, we could get something done.

I mean it: we could actually get something done.

Now, I know the Republican Leader will say, wait a minute, Democrats have partisan demands of their own, like providing assistance to save state and local services.

But to equate state and local aid—money for policemen and firefighters, bus drivers, sanitation workers—to complete corporate immunity is false equivalence. We know that the two policies are not equivalent.

First of all, there is broad, bipartisan support for state and local aid. It’s not a Democratic demand. Many Republicans support it too. There are bipartisan bills on the floor of the Senate demanding $500 billion in aid for the states. There are governors, Democrat and Republican, sending letters to all of us saying we need money, we need help.

But the Leader’s corporate immunity provision doesn’t have the support of a Democrat. Not a single person voted for it. It’s expressly partisan.

There is not equivalence. I know the media likes to say, on the one hand; on the other. There is not equivalence here. One policy is helping people who desperately need help. The other is a partisan demand that has been around for a long time that simply does not get bipartisan support.

State and local aid is a solution to a real and urgent problem, corporate immunity from lawsuits is not. They are not equivalent.

State and local budgets are deeply in the red. Since the beginning of the pandemic, states and municipalities have laid off 1.3 million public employees: firefighters, police, first responders, teachers. We’re talking about jobs—jobs—in red states as well as blue states.

The Leader likes to cite one statistic about tax revenue in one blue state to argue that no state—no state—deserves federal aid. Not Wyoming, or Alaska, or North Dakota, who have each seen sharp declines in tax revenue.

Not Florida or Nevada or Louisiana, who depend on tourism, and face revenue declines of 10 percent or more.

State and local aid is a real and urgent problem. It’s not abstract. It’s people and it’s workers. PPP that helps small businesses—one of its main rationales, an important one, something I agree with—prevents workers who work for small businesses from being laid off.

What is the difference between a worker being laid off by a small business—because they don't have funding—or a worker being laid off from a state and local government because they don't have funding? There is no difference. There is no difference.

And the Leader’s corporate immunity provision, on the other hand, is a solution, ideological, in search of a problem.

Almost a year into this pandemic, 15 million Americans infected, 290,000 lives lost to COVID-19—there have been only 23 personal-injury suits from exposure to the Coronavirus. Twenty-three. In the entire country. Over the entire year.

And that’s why Senate Republicans can’t reach a bipartisan agreement to help the unemployed, feed the hungry, fund a vaccine or support our schools?

Corporations who want protection from a few dozen lawsuits is equivalent to millions of workers from state and local governments being laid off? Give me a break. And again, there are a few states who don't need the help, but many more states do. Many more.

This is mind boggling. The Republican leadership is blocking a solution for the entire country until they get a favor for corporations who don’t even need it.

The American people, all of us, are sick of this ridiculous gamesmanship by the Majority Leader. We need to come together. We need to get something done. The American people deserve an outcome.

And it’s not going to happen if the Republican majority insists on getting 100% of its partisan demands.

 

###